Echelon Prime PricePRIME

1. What Are Trading Bots? Trading bots are automated software tools that execute trades based on pre-programmed conditions. They’re used for: Arbitrage (taking advantage of price differences) Scalping (executing many small trades quickly) Market making (providing liquidity) Trend-following and breakout strategies On platforms like Bitget, bots operate 24/7, reacting to price movements, volume surges, and order book changes in milliseconds. 2. Why Bots Flock to New Listings Like RDAC New tokens like RDAC are prime targets for bots because: Price discovery hasn’t occurred yet — bots can exploit inefficiencies. Low liquidity means small orders move prices quickly. Retail FOMO provides liquidity for bots to buy early and sell into. Volatility creates endless opportunities for profit. RDAC’s 905% move likely triggered hundreds of bot programs built to exploit the chaos. 3. Signs Bots Were Active in RDAC’s Rally A. Rapid Buy-Sell Sequences Spikes in price often came with fast, identical volume candles — a sign of bot-driven micro-trades. B. Order Book Sniping Many bots use "sniping" strategies to grab liquidity before human traders. RDAC saw large price changes with thin order books — ideal for sniping bots. C. Front-Running Bots are capable of “front-running” — detecting big buy orders and jumping ahead in execution to profit from short-term spikes. D. Candle Wicks and Flash Spikes The sharp upward wicks in RDAC’s chart followed by equally sharp pullbacks suggest bot-led liquidity grabs, not organic investor action. 4. How Bots Affect Retail Traders While bots provide liquidity, they also create challenges for retail participants: Slippage: Your order might get filled at a worse price. Fakeouts: Bots can trigger breakouts that reverse instantly, trapping late traders. Volatility: Bots exaggerate moves, making it harder to set proper stop-losses. For RDAC, bots likely accelerated the early rally and then began scalping the volatility, leading to rapid swings. 5. Can You Trade Around the Bots? Yes — if you understand how they behave: Avoid chasing spikes. Bots enter before you can and exit just as fast. Use limit orders. Avoid market orders that bots can exploit. Wait for consolidation. After bots finish the initial moves, clearer trends often emerge. Track volume patterns. Sudden surges in both volume and price are usually bot-driven — be cautious. Conclusion RDAC’s incredible launch-day rally was not purely organic — trading bots played a major role in inflating, accelerating, and manipulating short-term price action. While bots add liquidity and efficiency, they also raise the stakes for human traders. Understanding how bots operate can help investors avoid costly mistakes and even use bot activity to their advantage. $RDAC

China called out the UK and the United States on Monday over their newly signed trade deal, accusing both countries of deliberately designing the pact to edge Chinese goods out of British supply chains. The warning, issued by Beijing’s foreign ministry, followed the announcement of the Trump administration’s first formal trade agreement since it rolled out a sweeping plan for “reciprocal tariffs” last month. The deal, which involves intense security requirements for the UK’s steel and pharmaceutical sectors, is already straining London’s attempts to rebuild relations with Beijing, a goal that Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s government had been quietly working toward in recent months. According to the Financial Times, Beijing responded to questions about the deal by saying, “Co-operation between states should not be conducted against or to the detriment of the interests of third parties.” The message, issued directly by China’s foreign ministry, made it clear who the country thinks the “third party” is. The US–UK agreement has pushed the UK deeper into the crossfire of two economic powerhouses. And for Beijing, the UK’s choice to accept the deal’s conditions — especially ones tied to supply chain security and ownership of production facilities — looks like a decision to side with Washington. The structure of the trade pact includes sector-specific relief for UK steel and car exports, but only if the UK agrees to Trump’s conditions. That means accepting a baseline 10 percent tariff on British goods stays in place unless London passes a series of security tests. These tests fall under Section 232 investigations, which are supposed to check whether imported goods threaten US national security. But UK officials confirmed to the Financial Times that Donald Trump himself made it clear that these rules were meant to counter China. The US president has been using Section 232 as a weapon to pressure other governments. In this case, the UK was offered some relief — but only if it helps block China from global supply routes. That strategy, Beijing believes, is about forcing other countries to adopt Trump’s anti-China stance. Beijing didn’t wait to go public. Officials warned again that trade agreements should never be used to attack third countries. That warning wasn’t vague. It was a direct reaction to the US–UK deal, which Beijing says threatens its position in British markets. While China called out the UK–US deal, it also moved fast to adjust its own policy. Officials have already been pushing to strip foreign components out of Chinese supply chains in a broader effort to reduce exposure to outside pressure. That push has only accelerated now that Trump’s tariffs are being tied to bilateral deals. Still, Beijing is also trying to lower tensions on other fronts. On Monday, the US and China agreed to a 90-day truce in their wider trade war. As part of that deal, Washington dropped tariffs on Chinese imports from 145 percent down to around 40 percent. If both sides reach a deal to stop the export of fentanyl precursors from China to the US, those tariffs could drop again by up to 20 percentage points, bringing them closer to the levels Trump currently applies to US allies like the UK. Beijing is also lowering the heat on its end. It announced cuts to its own retaliatory tariffs on US goods, including energy and agricultural products, from 125 percent to just 10 percent. That move is meant to keep lines open — and prevent another escalation — while China figures out how to deal with countries like the UK that appear to be going along with Trump’s terms. But the fallout in London is already obvious. The UK government, trying to control the damage, said in a statement that the deal was signed “to secure thousands of jobs across key sectors, protect British businesses and lay the groundwork for greater trade in the future.” The government also claimed that trade and investment with China remain important to the UK, and that Britain is “continuing to engage pragmatically in areas that are rooted in UK and global interests.” Whether Beijing buys that explanation is still unclear. What’s certain is that China now views the UK as another player in Trump’s economic strategy, not a neutral partner. Cryptopolitan Academy: Want to grow your money in 2025? Learn how to do it with DeFi in our upcoming webclass. Save Your Spot

Reports claim Thailand is making efforts to become one of a number of countries in Asia to have shown a shift in its treatment of digital assets this year. Thailand’s Finance Ministry will reportedly issue 5 billion baht (about $150 million) worth of a new digital investment token within two months, according to statements made by Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira at a Tuesday briefing after the cabinet endorsed the initiative. The G-Token, as it is called, is a digital token that will be used to raise funds from the public under the current budget borrowing plan. However, Public Debt Management Office Director-General Patchara Anuntasilpa said at the Tuesday briefing that it should not be mistaken for a debt instrument. The G-Token launch reportedly comes after Thaksin Shinawatra, Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra’s father and de facto chief of the ruling Pheu Thai Party, in January urged Thailand to consider issuing stablecoins backed by government bonds, making them available for retail and institutional investment. Pichai stated at the briefing that investors can invest with a small amount of cash for the tokens and are assured higher earnings than bank deposits. As it stands, Thai banks offer 12-month deposit interest rates of about 1.25% to 1.5%, below the Bank of Thailand’s benchmark interest rate of 1.75%. It is the lowest interest rate the country has seen in two years and is a side effect of Trump’s all-out assault on global trade, which worsened the outlook for economic growth. According to Pichai, G-Token is considered an investment token, and the new investment offering meets all of the Bank of Thailand’s conditions. The initial 5 billion baht issue is designed to “test the market,” he has said. Thailand is embracing crypto, but it is not the only Asian country in that category. Several other Asian countries have also signaled shifts in their approach to cryptocurrency in recent times, gravitating toward more supportive or clarified regulatory frameworks to encourage innovation while addressing the risks involved. One Asian country that stands out especially for its stance towards crypto is Singapore. It is already famous for its innovation and embrace of the digital asset world. It has now set its sights on becoming a global crypto hub using a balanced regulatory approach that encourages innovation without compromising on consumer protections. Hong Kong is another Asian region that has changed its cautious stance towards crypto, instead becoming more positive, focusing on regulated innovation. There have even been reports of deliberations about a strategic Bitcoin reserve. Japan also makes the list. The country used to have strict regulations, but that has changed, and it has taken on a more progressive stance, easing barriers to crypto adoption and even encouraging Web3 development. While it is not entirely true that crypto was not a thing in these countries before Trump’s administration, many have attributed the new wave of positivity towards crypto to the US president’s friendly outlook on the digital asset industry. Your crypto news deserves attention - KEY Difference Wire puts you on 250+ top sites

Thailand’s Finance Ministry plans to issue 5 billion baht ($150 million) in digital investment tokens—called the G-Token—within two months. Unlike traditional bonds, the G-Token is not classified as a debt instrument. Instead, it will be offered under Thailand’s budget borrowing plan, which aims to raise funds directly from the public, according to Bloomberg reporting . The move marks a shift in the government’s fundraising strategy and expands retail access to state-backed investments. According to Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajirai, investors will be able to participate with small amounts of capital and can expect returns higher than current bank deposit rates. The tokens are expected to meet all Bank of Thailand regulations and could help boost secondary bond market activity, offering more liquidity and accessibility. The current phase will serve as a test, with future issuances possible depending on demand. Thailand’s cabinet approved the G-Token plan and is part of broader digital asset initiatives being explored under the ruling Pheu Thai Party. Earlier this year, Thaksin Shinawatra—the father of Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra—advocated for government bond-backed stablecoins to support both retail and institutional investors. The Bank of Thailand recently cut its key interest rate to 1.75%, prompting the search for higher-yielding alternatives among savers. Traditional bank deposits currently offer returns of about 1.25% to 1.5%. Thailand joins a growing number of Asian countries exploring blockchain-based finance, as global trends—including the U.S.’s evolving crypto stance—begin to influence regional policy.

Thailand plans $150M G-Token bond issuance Bloomberg reported that Thailand’s Finance Ministry plans to issue 5 billion baht ($150 million) via a digital investment token called the G-Token. Pichai Chunhavajira, Thailand’s Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister, said that