Usualの‌価格USUAL

Bitget Onchain has become a go-to for traders looking to access new projects without the usual hassle no seed phrase, no complicated setups. Just connect and trade. It's made jumping into early opportunities like $RFC and $HOUSE , which saw impressive surges, fast and seamless. With intuitive tools and early access to promising tokens, Bitget Onchain isn’t just simplifying onchain trading—it’s changing the game.

While $SHM’s trajectory shares several traits with standard Layer 1 () post-launch patterns, there are also distinct elements that could steer its journey differently. Common Post-Launch Behavior: New tokens often debut with strong upward momentum, driven by launch hype, initial funding, and early investor enthusiasm. This phase is usually followed by a correction or consolidation period as token unlocks occur and speculative interest begins to fade. Over time, a token’s long-term performance hinges on tangible factors such as network activity, developer engagement, ecosystem expansion, and real user adoption. How Might $SHM Compare? 1. Launch Hype and Price Pressure: $SHM experienced significant early attention thanks to Shardeum’s value proposition—scalable and secure smart contracts using dynamic state sharding. As with other L1s, early investor participation likely contributed to the initial rally. As token unlocks continue, typical post-launch selling and volatility are to be expected. 2. Developer and Ecosystem Focus: Shardeum stands out by prioritizing developer incentives, rapid testnet iterations, and a community-driven governance model. If it succeeds in cultivating a strong ecosystem with active builders and users, it could support continued demand beyond the initial excitement. 3. Token Design and Incentives: $SHM’s tokenomics are built to encourage long-term participation through features like staking, governance rights, and ecosystem-based rewards. These mechanisms are designed to align user incentives and potentially curb excessive short-term sell pressure. 4. Market Conditions Matter: The broader crypto market environment will play a key role. In bearish or flat markets, even strong L1s can undergo prolonged sideways movement. Conversely, in bullish conditions, well-positioned projects like Shardeum could quickly regain traction. 5. Positioning Among Rivals: Shardeum enters a crowded L1 field with competitors like Aptos and Sui. Its ability to stand out in terms of scalability, developer experience, and technology will be crucial in determining whether it follows the usual trajectory or charts a unique course. Conclusion: $SHM is likely to experience the standard L1 arc—early enthusiasm, a period of adjustment tied to unlocks and sentiment, and a longer-term phase driven by real fundamentals. However, Shardeum’s strategic focus on developer growth and smart tokenomics could help it sidestep some of the more severe corrections seen in other L1s, potentially setting it up as a more durable contender in the space.$SHM

TL;DR On May 8, the official X channel behind the project with over 4.3 million followers said a big ecosystem announcement was coming on May 14. Although it failed to provide any further details, the community started speculating with a few options, but a possible Binance listing was at the forefront since some members claimed that the exchange had experimented with backend PI deposits and withdrawals. However, such a listing on the world’s largest crypto exchange would have to wait, as the actual statement revealed yesterday has nothing to do with any trading platforms. The team announced the launch of Pi Network Ventures, which is a $100 million initiative in PI and USD that will invest in “startups and businesses that advance the utility and real-adoption of PI.” The comments below the post were split, as usual, with some praising it as a “huge” for the entire PI ecosystem, while others criticized that it is just “another announcement of what they plan to do, not what they have done or are doing.” The hype after the initial post from last week brought spectacular price gains for the project’s native token. It almost tripled within less than a week, going from $0.6 to over $1.7. However, this hype-driven rally came to a screeching halt at that point and has tumbled below $0.9 as of now. This seems to be a classic ‘buy the rumor, sell the news’ event, in which the asset’s price surges ahead of the actual announcement but slumps after it. PI is down by 28% in the past 24 hours and has shed 50% of its value since its local peak registered just a few days ago.

$GORK dirty tricks as usual but supported by u kno who…

There is a discussion going on among crypto enthusiasts, with the topic being that someone is adamant about tanking the stablecoin legislation. The main suggested culprits are regional US banks, and Ripple’s CTO David Schwartz seems to agree , saying: “That’s what I’m hearing.” Fear has been cited as the main reason why this may be true. Banks fear stablecoins could disintermediate their market share, with critics like Senator Elizabeth Warren proposing amendments to block tech firms from issuing stablecoins. This just highlights tensions between traditional finance and crypto innovation. The notion isn’t anything new, as it’s been talked about before how traditional banking institutions perceive stablecoins as a competitive threat to their dominance in payment systems. This also explains why the stablecoin bill GENIUS Act failed in its recent vote. One of the main legislations surrounding stablecoins is the GENIUS Act. Short for ‘Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins’, it seeks to regulate stablecoin issuers and integrate them into the US financial system. Two months ago, the GENIUS Act passed the Senate Banking Committee with an 18-6 vote to regulate stablecoins comprehensively. However, earlier this month, it failed to pass a full Senate vote, as the bill didn’t get the 60 votes needed due to nine Senate Democrats withdrawing their support, as well as two of their Republican peers. Some mentioned the insufficient anti-money laundering provisions and potential national security risks as reasons for withdrawal, while other reasons were reports of Donald Trump’s ties to crypto ventures, including a $2 billion investment in a Trump-affiliated stablecoin. Such a turn of events could point to deep divisions and the influence of external factors like the banking sector lobbying. The interplay between traditional banking interests and emerging crypto regulations will likely shape the future of the financial industry. If the GENIUS Act or any similar stablecoin bills pass in the future, it could be seen as a potential disruptor to banks’ traditional financial services. For instance, stablecoins could enable peer-to-peer transactions without the need for usual banking intermediaries. Whatever the case, the sooner this is done, the better it will be for the crypto industry, as clear and fair regulations could bolster investor confidence, while prolonged uncertainty may hinder the growth of the crypto sector. Still, one thing is for sure – the outcome of the GENIUS Act will set precedents for how digital assets are integrated and regulated within the US financial framework. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.